sne.space Open Supernova Catalog
🔭 Pro Cockpit 📖 Story View

SN2017nf

Type I ● Brightness Unmeasured
Aliases: 2017nf, PS17beu, AT2017nf, SN 2017nf  |  Discovered: 2017/01/22 by R. Gagliano, J. Newton, R. Post, E. Weinberg, T. Puckett
⚡ Re-Enrich Data 📥 Download JSON 📊 Photometry CSV
Host Optical Cutout 0.26″/pix
DESI DR10 Optical (0.26″/pix)
SN2017nf cutout
Interactive Sky ↗

Core Parameters

R.A. (J2000)11:10:52.808 (167.72003°)
Dec. (J2000)+28:16:27.83 (28.27440°)
Spectral TypeI
Redshift (z)0.037
Recession Velocity10887.2 km/s (redshift Doppler-equivalent)
Luminosity Distance168.196 Mpc (~531.5 Million Light-Years, μ = 36.06)
Discovery Magnitude18 (Clear)
Peak magnitude: Not established
Peak Absolute Mag—
MW Dust E(B-V)0.0191 mag
derived from galactic coordinates (coordinate model), not a dust-map measurement
Host Galaxy—
Host Offset—
Observations0 detections, 0 spectra

Interactive Sky Field (Aladin) ✨ DSS2 Optical (China-VO mirror)

🎯 11:10:52.808 +28:16:27.83 FOV: 0.15°
● SN2017nf (I)
Coordinate Pointing & Airmass
Brightness not measured: discovered 9.8 years ago (2017/01/22). No calibrated photometry is published. No reliable current brightness estimate is available.
Multi-Band Light Curve
|
Calibrated Spectra Viewer

Literature & Data Provenance

IDSourceReferenceNASA ADS Bibcode
[1]Transient Name Server—
[2]2017TNSTR..93....1GR. Gagliano2017TNSTR..93....1G
[3]The Open Supernova CatalogGuillochon et al. (2017)2017ApJ...835...64G
[4]Planck 2015Planck Collaboration (2016)2016A&A...594A..13P
[5]Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011)Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011)2011ApJ...737..103S

❓ Frequently Asked Questions About SN2017nf

Scientific & observational Q&As indexed from astronomical databases & the Open Supernova Catalog
What type of supernova is SN2017nf and what kind of star exploded? Astrophysics & Progenitor
SN2017nf is cataloged as a Type I transient. Mechanism-specific claims (progenitor mass, nickel yield, remnant type) require more than this label and are not asserted here as object-specific measurements.
What was the progenitor star doing in the millions of years leading up to SN2017nf? Astrophysics & Progenitor
The specific progenitor of SN2017nf has not been observed. Events of this spectroscopic class are generally associated with massive-star core collapse after successive nuclear burning stages (hydrogen → helium → carbon → neon → oxygen → silicon → iron). Typical lifetimes of such progenitors are tens of millions of years, but that is a class expectation—not a measured age or evolutionary track for this star. No pre-explosion imaging identification is cited in the available record for SN2017nf.
How far away is SN2017nf from Earth and how old is the light reaching us? Cosmic Distance & Time
SN2017nf has a luminosity distance of approximately 548.6 Million Light-Years (redshift z = 0.037, d_L = 168.196 Mpc). Under a flat ΛCDM cosmology (H₀≈70 km/s/Mpc, Ωₘ≈0.3), the corresponding lookback time is ≈503 Myr — when the light set out 503.3 million years ago during the Paleozoic era, long before the first dinosaurs appeared on Earth. Luminosity distance is larger than the light-travel distance because cosmic expansion stretches the path; the two must not be equated.
What does the cosmological redshift of SN2017nf tell us about the expansion of space? Cosmic Distance & Time
SN2017nf exhibits a measured spectroscopic redshift of z = 0.0370. The cockpit reports a user-facing recession velocity of 10,887.2 km/s, computed as the redshift Doppler-equivalent v = c·((1+z)²−1)/((1+z)²+1). Cosmological redshift is not generally equivalent to special-relativistic motion through space; this number is a convenient velocity label for z, not a measured peculiar velocity and not supernova ejecta speed. Bare c·z (≈11,092 km/s) is a different low-z approximation and is not mixed here.
How bright did SN2017nf become at its peak, and how many Suns does that equal? Explosion Energetics
At peak brightness, SN2017nf achieved an apparent magnitude of 18.
How much total energy was released by SN2017nf, and where did that energy go? Explosion Energetics
Core-collapse events of this broad class are often discussed with a ~10⁵³ erg gravitational binding energy of which ~99% may escape as neutrinos—again a class scale, not a measured budget for SN2017nf.
How fast are the supernova ejecta and shockwave of SN2017nf expanding through space? Explosion Energetics
No ejecta velocity is measured for SN2017nf. Blast-wave speed is obtained from Doppler shifts of spectral absorption features (e.g. Si II λ6355 for Type Ia), not from cosmological redshift. Any recession velocity derived from z describes Hubble flow, not the explosion debris.
What powers the prolonged glow of SN2017nf weeks and months after detonation? Radioactive Engine
Classified core-collapse light curves are often sustained after peak by radioactive ⁵⁶Ni → ⁵⁶Co → ⁵⁶Fe decay, with typical nickel yields of order 0.05–0.15 solar masses—again a class scale, not a measured yield for SN2017nf. Shock-breakout heating may dominate the earliest optical flash; without a published bolometric fit, neither nickel mass nor the dominant power source is established for this event.
What chemical elements did SN2017nf create and disperse into the universe? Nucleosynthesis & Elements
The nucleosynthetic products of SN2017nf are unknown because its type is unresolved. Element yields depend directly on the explosion mechanism: a thermonuclear Type Ia produces mostly iron-peak elements such as 56Ni and 56Fe, whereas a core-collapse event produces large quantities of oxygen, neon, magnesium and silicon from successive burning shells. No spectrum has been published for this transient, so which of these occurred is not established.
Did SN2017nf leave behind a black hole, a neutron star, or nothing at all? Cosmic Remnant
A core-collapse explosion associated with SN2017nf's class forges an ultra-dense compact stellar remnant at the center of the detonation. If the progenitor had an initial mass under ~20 solar masses, it left behind a neutron star (pulsar)—packing the mass of our entire Sun into a city-sized sphere barely 20 kilometers wide, spinning dozens or hundreds of times per second. If the progenitor exceeded ~25–30 solar masses, gravity overcame neutron degeneracy pressure, creating a permanent stellar-mass black hole.
What will SN2017nf's explosion site look like in 1,000 to 10,000 years? Cosmic Remnant
Supernova remnants in general evolve through free-expansion, Sedov–Taylor, and radiative phases over centuries to millennia, sometimes becoming bright X-ray shells and occasionally compressing nearby molecular clouds. These are standard remnant-evolution models, not forecasts measured for SN2017nf. Whether this site will trigger star formation, reach particular X-ray temperatures, or match Cassiopeia A depends on local density and magnetic field—none of which are constrained by the data shown here.
In which galaxy did SN2017nf explode, and where is it located relative to the galactic center? Galactic Environment
No host galaxy is identified for SN2017nf in this catalog record. A blank host field means the association is unresolved here—it does not establish that the host is uncataloged, resolved in imaging, or securely linked by astrometry. Possible states (unidentified, hostless candidate, imaging detection without a catalog name, or a securely matched cataloged galaxy) require separate evidence that is not present in this field.
Where is SN2017nf located in the night sky and which constellation is it in? Sky Coordinates
In the celestial sphere, SN2017nf is located at Right Ascension 11:10:52.808 and Declination +28:16:27.83, situated in the constellation Leo Minor (The Lesser Lion). Because its declination is +28:16:27.83, it is primarily placed in the Northern celestial hemisphere.
How much Milky Way interstellar dust obscures our view of SN2017nf? Interstellar Dust
Along this line of sight, the catalog records a Milky Way foreground color excess of E(B−V) = 0.0191 mag (source: 5), corresponding to roughly A_V ≈ 0.06 mag for R_V = 3.1. Band-specific corrections (e.g. A_r) differ from A_V and should be applied when available. Map-based values (IRSA / Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011) must not be claimed unless that map was actually queried.
Across which photometric filter bands was SN2017nf monitored? Astronomical Observations
No calibrated photometry is published for SN2017nf. Without multi-epoch flux measurements, neither a light curve nor a peak magnitude can be established. Follow-up imaging from survey alert streams would be required to map its brightness evolution.
What did astronomical spectroscopy reveal about SN2017nf's chemical makeup? Astronomical Observations
No spectrum has been published for SN2017nf. Without spectroscopy, its chemical composition, expansion velocity, and physical classification cannot be established. Classification spectra from follow-up observatories would be required to identify diagnostic absorption and emission lines.
Who discovered SN2017nf and how was it first detected? Discovery & History
SN2017nf was officially reported on 2017/01/22 by R. Gagliano, J. Newton, R. Post, E. Weinberg, T. Puckett. Discoveries are typically flagged by high-cadence robotic survey telescopes (such as ATLAS, ZTF, Pan-STARRS, ASAS-SN, or Gaia) and worldwide amateur astronomers scanning the night sky, followed by rapid spectroscopic classification by international observatories.
How many scientific publications and observatories have contributed data to SN2017nf? Scientific Research
SN2017nf is documented across 5 scientific references and archival data sources in the Open Supernova Catalog. These include discovery circulars and research datasets from Transient Name Server, 2017TNSTR..93....1G, The Open Supernova Catalog, Planck 2015. All raw photometry and spectroscopy points are cross-indexed to their original bibliographic records for peer-reviewed verification.
What other names and survey identifiers exist for SN2017nf? Cross-Identifications
Throughout global alert streams and survey databases, SN2017nf has also been designated as: 2017nf, PS17beu, AT2017nf, SN 2017nf. These cross-matched identifiers allow astronomers to cross-reference observations across the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS), Pan-STARRS, Gaia Photometric Science Alerts, and the IAU Transient Name Server (TNS).
How does SN2017nf contribute to measuring the Hubble Constant and the scale of the cosmos? Cosmology & Distance Ladder
SN2017nf cannot currently be used for cosmological distance work because its classification is unresolved. The distance ladder relies on type-specific techniques: Type Ia supernovae use the Phillips relation between peak absolute magnitude and decline rate, while Type II events use the Expanding Photosphere Method or SCM-II. An unclassified transient fits neither, so no Hubble-constant constraint can be derived from it until a spectrum establishes its type.
Could gravitational waves or neutrinos from SN2017nf be detected on Earth? Multi-Messenger Astronomy
No neutrino or gravitational-wave counterpart has been reported for SN2017nf, and none is expected to be identifiable without a classification. The multi-messenger signature differs sharply by type: core-collapse events emit a neutrino burst at shock breakout (detected once, for SN 1987A), while thermonuclear Type Ia events produce negligible neutrinos and gravitational waves. Searching for a counterpart before knowing which mechanism applies would be unfocused.
How does SN2017nf compare to famous historical supernovae like SN 1987A or the Crab Supernova? Historical Comparison
Compared to historical landmarks like SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (168,000 light-years away, naked-eye peak m = 2.9) or the Crab Supernova of 1054 (6,500 light-years away), SN2017nf occurred at a distance of 548.6 Million Light-Years. While historical naked-eye supernovae occurred within our Milky Way or its immediate satellites, modern discoveries like SN2017nf allow astrophysicists to probe diverse galactic environments, metallicities, and stellar populations across the broader universe.
Can I see SN2017nf tonight with a backyard telescope or binoculars? Backyard Observation
Unknown — no measured brightness. SN2017nf was discovered 3574 days ago (2017/01/22), but no calibrated photometry is published for it, so its current apparent magnitude cannot be stated. Without a magnitude there is no basis for a telescope-aperture recommendation. Use the coordinates and airmass chart above to plan a follow-up observation and report what you measure.
Does the radiation or shockwave from SN2017nf pose any threat to Earth? Planetary Safety
No, Earth is in zero danger. Supernovae are violent events emitting powerful gamma rays, X-rays, and cosmic rays; however, the astrophysical 'lethal kill zone' for our planet's protective ozone layer is estimated at 50 to 100 light-years. At a distance of 548.6 Million Light-Years, the inverse-square law dilutes the radiation by quintillions of times, making SN2017nf completely harmless to our biosphere and purely a fascinating spectacle for human exploration.
Data sourced from IAU TNS, ALeRCE, WISeREP, and the Open Supernova Catalog. View All General Astrophysics FAQs →