Host Optical Cutout
0.26″/pix
DESI DR10 Optical (0.26″/pix)
Core Parameters
| R.A. (J2000) | 15:52:18.005 (238.07502°) |
|---|---|
| Dec. (J2000) | +10:20:58.94 (10.34971°) |
| Spectral Type | NT |
| Redshift (z) | — |
| Recession Velocity | — |
| Luminosity Distance | — |
| Reported Magnitude | 18.5 Peak magnitude: Not established |
| Peak Absolute Mag | — |
| MW Dust E(B-V) | 0.0474 mag (AV = 0.15 mag) derived from galactic coordinates (Analytical Galactic Disk Model (IAU)), not a dust-map measurement |
| Host Galaxy | — |
| Host Offset | — |
| Observations | 0 detections, 0 spectra |
Interactive Sky Field (Aladin) ✨ DSS2 Optical (China-VO mirror)
🎯 15:52:18.005 +10:20:58.94
FOV: 0.15°
● AT2019yk (NT)
Coordinate Pointing & Airmass
Brightness not measured: discovered 7.8 years ago (2019/01/22). No calibrated photometry is published. No reliable current brightness estimate is available.
Multi-Band Light Curve
|
Calibrated Spectra Viewer
🌌 Cosmic Neighbors & Contemporaries
105,868+ transients indexed
Cataloged transients closest to AT2019yk in discovery time, spatial sky neighborhood, and cosmological redshift:
⏱️ Closest in Time
AT2019aad
Exploded same day
Type Candidate
2019/01/22 · Mag 18.8
AT2019abm
Exploded same day
Type Candidate
2019/01/22 · Mag 19
AT2019aalc
Exploded same day
Type Candidate
2019/01/22 · Mag 18.4
🔭 Closest on the Sky
AT2020pnj
13.2′ away
Type Candidate
Discovered 2020/07/16
PS1-1000253
15.4′ away
Type II L
Discovered 2010/05/11
AT2019ibz
27.7′ away
Type Candidate
Discovered 2019/06/19
🌌 Same Cosmic Era (Redshift)
No redshift match available (target z missing or no comparable redshifts in index).
Literature & Data Provenance
| ID | Source | Reference | NASA ADS Bibcode |
|---|---|---|---|
| No sources recorded. | |||
❓ Frequently Asked Questions About AT2019yk
Scientific & observational Q&As indexed from astronomical databases & the sne.space
What type of supernova is AT2019yk and what kind of star exploded? Astrophysics & Progenitor
AT2019yk is cataloged as a Type NT transient. Mechanism-specific claims (progenitor mass, nickel yield, remnant type) require more than this label and are not asserted here as object-specific measurements.
What was the progenitor star doing in the millions of years leading up to AT2019yk? Astrophysics & Progenitor
The specific progenitor of AT2019yk has not been observed. Events of this spectroscopic class are generally associated with massive-star core collapse after successive nuclear burning stages (hydrogen → helium → carbon → neon → oxygen → silicon → iron). Typical lifetimes of such progenitors are tens of millions of years, but that is a class expectation—not a measured age or evolutionary track for this star. No pre-explosion imaging identification is cited in the available record for AT2019yk.
How far away is AT2019yk from Earth and how old is the light reaching us? Cosmic Distance & Time
The distance to AT2019yk has not been measured. No spectroscopic redshift or luminosity distance is published for this transient, so neither its distance from Earth nor its lookback time can be stated. A redshift requires a spectrum, and a photometric redshift requires multi-band imaging that has not been reported. Without a distance, its intrinsic luminosity and total energy release are also undetermined. Check the sources below for follow-up spectroscopy or host-galaxy identification.
What does the cosmological redshift of AT2019yk tell us about the expansion of space? Cosmic Distance & Time
No spectroscopic redshift has been measured for AT2019yk. Without a published z, its place in the Hubble flow, recession velocity, and lookback time cannot be stated. A redshift requires a spectrum (or a well-calibrated photometric redshift from multi-band imaging). Check the sources below for follow-up spectroscopy.
How bright did AT2019yk become at its peak, and how many Suns does that equal? Explosion Energetics
At peak brightness, AT2019yk achieved an apparent magnitude of 18.5 around 2019/01/22.
How much total energy was released by AT2019yk, and where did that energy go? Explosion Energetics
Core-collapse events of this broad class are often discussed with a ~10⁵³ erg gravitational binding energy of which ~99% may escape as neutrinos—again a class scale, not a measured budget for AT2019yk.
How fast are the supernova ejecta and shockwave of AT2019yk expanding through space? Explosion Energetics
No ejecta velocity is measured for AT2019yk. Blast-wave speed is obtained from Doppler shifts of spectral absorption features (e.g. Si II λ6355 for Type Ia), not from cosmological redshift. Any recession velocity derived from z describes Hubble flow, not the explosion debris.
What powers the prolonged glow of AT2019yk weeks and months after detonation? Radioactive Engine
Classified core-collapse light curves are often sustained after peak by radioactive ⁵⁶Ni → ⁵⁶Co → ⁵⁶Fe decay, with typical nickel yields of order 0.05–0.15 solar masses—again a class scale, not a measured yield for AT2019yk. Shock-breakout heating may dominate the earliest optical flash; without a published bolometric fit, neither nickel mass nor the dominant power source is established for this event.
What chemical elements did AT2019yk create and disperse into the universe? Nucleosynthesis & Elements
The nucleosynthetic products of AT2019yk are unknown because its type is unresolved. Element yields depend directly on the explosion mechanism: a thermonuclear Type Ia produces mostly iron-peak elements such as 56Ni and 56Fe, whereas a core-collapse event produces large quantities of oxygen, neon, magnesium and silicon from successive burning shells. No spectrum has been published for this transient, so which of these occurred is not established.
Did AT2019yk leave behind a black hole, a neutron star, or nothing at all? Cosmic Remnant
A core-collapse explosion associated with AT2019yk's class forges an ultra-dense compact stellar remnant at the center of the detonation. If the progenitor had an initial mass under ~20 solar masses, it left behind a neutron star (pulsar)—packing the mass of our entire Sun into a city-sized sphere barely 20 kilometers wide, spinning dozens or hundreds of times per second. If the progenitor exceeded ~25–30 solar masses, gravity overcame neutron degeneracy pressure, creating a permanent stellar-mass black hole.
What will AT2019yk's explosion site look like in 1,000 to 10,000 years? Cosmic Remnant
Supernova remnants in general evolve through free-expansion, Sedov–Taylor, and radiative phases over centuries to millennia, sometimes becoming bright X-ray shells and occasionally compressing nearby molecular clouds. These are standard remnant-evolution models, not forecasts measured for AT2019yk. Whether this site will trigger star formation, reach particular X-ray temperatures, or match Cassiopeia A depends on local density and magnetic field—none of which are constrained by the data shown here.
In which galaxy did AT2019yk explode, and where is it located relative to the galactic center? Galactic Environment
No host galaxy is identified for AT2019yk in this catalog record. A blank host field means the association is unresolved here—it does not establish that the host is uncataloged, resolved in imaging, or securely linked by astrometry. Possible states (unidentified, hostless candidate, imaging detection without a catalog name, or a securely matched cataloged galaxy) require separate evidence that is not present in this field.
Where is AT2019yk located in the night sky and which constellation is it in? Sky Coordinates
In the celestial sphere, AT2019yk is located at Right Ascension 15:52:18.005 and Declination +10:20:58.94, situated in the constellation Serpens (The Serpent). Because its declination is +10:20:58.94, it is primarily placed in the Northern celestial hemisphere.
How much Milky Way interstellar dust obscures our view of AT2019yk? Interstellar Dust
Along this line of sight, the catalog records a Milky Way foreground color excess of E(B−V) = 0.0474 mag (source: Analytical Galactic Disk Model (IAU)), corresponding to roughly A_V ≈ 0.15 mag for R_V = 3.1. Band-specific corrections (e.g. A_r) differ from A_V and should be applied when available. Map-based values (IRSA / Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011) must not be claimed unless that map was actually queried.
Across which photometric filter bands was AT2019yk monitored? Astronomical Observations
No calibrated photometry is published for AT2019yk. Without multi-epoch flux measurements, neither a light curve nor a peak magnitude can be established. Follow-up imaging from survey alert streams would be required to map its brightness evolution.
What did astronomical spectroscopy reveal about AT2019yk's chemical makeup? Astronomical Observations
No spectrum has been published for AT2019yk. Without spectroscopy, its chemical composition, expansion velocity, and physical classification cannot be established. Classification spectra from follow-up observatories would be required to identify diagnostic absorption and emission lines.
Who discovered AT2019yk and how was it first detected? Discovery & History
AT2019yk was officially reported on 2019/01/22 by ZTF. Discoveries are typically flagged by high-cadence robotic survey telescopes (such as ATLAS, ZTF, Pan-STARRS, ASAS-SN, or Gaia) and worldwide amateur astronomers scanning the night sky, followed by rapid spectroscopic classification by international observatories.
How many scientific publications and observatories have contributed data to AT2019yk? Scientific Research
Data for AT2019yk are compiled from international astronomical notices, the IAU Transient Name Server (TNS), and peer-reviewed astrophysical journals.
What other names and survey identifiers exist for AT2019yk? Cross-Identifications
Throughout global alert streams and survey databases, AT2019yk has also been designated as:
ZTF19aacivld. These cross-matched identifiers allow astronomers to cross-reference observations across the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS), Pan-STARRS, Gaia Photometric Science Alerts, and the IAU Transient Name Server (TNS).How does AT2019yk contribute to measuring the Hubble Constant and the scale of the cosmos? Cosmology & Distance Ladder
AT2019yk cannot currently be used for cosmological distance work because its classification is unresolved. The distance ladder relies on type-specific techniques: Type Ia supernovae use the Phillips relation between peak absolute magnitude and decline rate, while Type II events use the Expanding Photosphere Method or SCM-II. An unclassified transient fits neither, so no Hubble-constant constraint can be derived from it until a spectrum establishes its type.
Could gravitational waves or neutrinos from AT2019yk be detected on Earth? Multi-Messenger Astronomy
No neutrino or gravitational-wave counterpart has been reported for AT2019yk, and none is expected to be identifiable without a classification. The multi-messenger signature differs sharply by type: core-collapse events emit a neutrino burst at shock breakout (detected once, for SN 1987A), while thermonuclear Type Ia events produce negligible neutrinos and gravitational waves. Searching for a counterpart before knowing which mechanism applies would be unfocused.
How does AT2019yk compare to famous historical supernovae like SN 1987A or the Crab Supernova? Historical Comparison
Compared to historical landmarks like SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (168,000 light-years away, naked-eye peak m = 2.9) or the Crab Supernova of 1054 (6,500 light-years away), the distance to AT2019yk is not measured, so no such comparison can be drawn. While historical naked-eye supernovae occurred within our Milky Way or its immediate satellites, modern discoveries like AT2019yk allow astrophysicists to probe diverse galactic environments, metallicities, and stellar populations across the broader universe.
Can I see AT2019yk tonight with a backyard telescope or binoculars? Backyard Observation
Unknown — no measured brightness. AT2019yk was discovered 2850 days ago (2019/01/22), but no calibrated photometry is published for it, so its current apparent magnitude cannot be stated. Without a magnitude there is no basis for a telescope-aperture recommendation. Use the coordinates and airmass chart above to plan a follow-up observation and report what you measure.
Does the radiation or shockwave from AT2019yk pose any threat to Earth? Planetary Safety
Earth is in no danger from AT2019yk. The astrophysical 'lethal kill zone' for a supernova to damage our ozone layer is roughly 50 to 100 light-years. This transient is far outside the solar neighbourhood: it was discovered by a wide-field survey at a magnitude only reachable for an extragalactic object, and any transient in our own galaxy within that radius would have appeared far brighter than the ~18th magnitude reported here. Its exact distance is unmeasured, but the detection brightness alone rules out any nearby threat.
Data sourced from IAU TNS, ALeRCE, WISeREP, and the sne.space.
View All General Astrophysics FAQs →