Host Optical Cutout
0.26″/pix
Pan-STARRS1 DR1 Optical (0.25″/pix)
Core Parameters
| R.A. (J2000) | 02:21:59.98 (35.49992°) |
|---|---|
| Dec. (J2000) | +33:16:13.7 (33.27047°) |
| Spectral Type | Ia |
| Redshift (z) | — |
| Recession Velocity | — |
| Luminosity Distance | — |
| Reported Magnitude | 14.96 Peak magnitude: Not established |
| Peak Absolute Mag | — |
| MW Dust E(B-V) | 0.0668 mag |
| Host Galaxy | — |
| Host Offset | — |
| Observations | 0 detections, 0 spectra |
Interactive Sky Field (Aladin) ✨ DSS2 Optical (China-VO mirror)
🎯 02:21:59.98 +33:16:13.7
FOV: 0.15°
● iPTF13ebh (Ia)
Coordinate Pointing & Airmass
Brightness not measured: discovered 13.0 years ago (2013/11/14). No calibrated photometry is published. No reliable current brightness estimate is available.
Multi-Band Light Curve
|
Calibrated Spectra Viewer
🌌 Cosmic Neighbors & Contemporaries
105,768+ transients indexed
Cataloged transients closest to iPTF13ebh in discovery time, spatial sky neighborhood, and cosmological redshift:
⏱️ Closest in Time
LSQ13czi
Exploded same day
Type Ia
2013/11/14 · Mag 19.8
LSQ13czl
Exploded same day
Type II P
2013/11/14 · Mag 19.8
LSQ13czk
Exploded same day
Type Ia
2013/11/14 · Mag 18.7
🔭 Closest on the Sky
iPTF13ebh
0.0′ away
Type Ia
Discovered 2013/11/13
AT2020aadc
17.4′ away
Type Candidate
Discovered 2020/11/16
AT2020gfn
23.8′ away
Type Candidate
Discovered 2020/01/23
🌌 Same Cosmic Era (Redshift)
No redshift match available (target z missing or no comparable redshifts in index).
Literature & Data Provenance
| ID | Source | Reference | NASA ADS Bibcode |
|---|---|---|---|
| No sources recorded. | |||
❓ Frequently Asked Questions About iPTF13ebh
Scientific & observational Q&As indexed from astronomical databases & the Open Supernova Catalog
What type of supernova is iPTF13ebh and what kind of star exploded? Astrophysics & Progenitor
iPTF13ebh is spectroscopically classified as a Type Ia supernova, consistent with a thermonuclear explosion involving a carbon-oxygen white dwarf. Type Ia events are used as distance indicators via empirical relations such as the Phillips relation, but that cosmological utility does not identify which binary channel (single-degenerate accretion, double-degenerate merger, or sub-Chandrasekhar detonation) produced this object.
What was the progenitor star doing in the millions of years leading up to iPTF13ebh? Astrophysics & Progenitor
No unique progenitor history is established for iPTF13ebh. Type Ia spectral classification is consistent with a thermonuclear explosion of a carbon-oxygen white dwarf, but it does not identify which binary pathway produced this event. Leading models include single-degenerate accretion toward the Chandrasekhar mass, double-degenerate white-dwarf mergers, and sub-Chandrasekhar helium-shell detonations. Distinguishing these requires population statistics, early-time spectra, or remnant searches that are not established for this individual object. Claims that this white dwarf accreted for millions of years, or that it approached 1.4 solar masses, are general theory—not documented facts about iPTF13ebh.
How far away is iPTF13ebh from Earth and how old is the light reaching us? Cosmic Distance & Time
The distance to iPTF13ebh has not been measured. No spectroscopic redshift or luminosity distance is published for this transient, so neither its distance from Earth nor its lookback time can be stated. A redshift requires a spectrum, and a photometric redshift requires multi-band imaging that has not been reported. Without a distance, its intrinsic luminosity and total energy release are also undetermined. Check the sources below for follow-up spectroscopy or host-galaxy identification.
What does the cosmological redshift of iPTF13ebh tell us about the expansion of space? Cosmic Distance & Time
No spectroscopic redshift has been measured for iPTF13ebh. Without a published z, its place in the Hubble flow, recession velocity, and lookback time cannot be stated. A redshift requires a spectrum (or a well-calibrated photometric redshift from multi-band imaging). Check the sources below for follow-up spectroscopy.
How bright did iPTF13ebh become at its peak, and how many Suns does that equal? Explosion Energetics
At peak brightness, iPTF13ebh achieved an apparent magnitude of 14.96 around 2013/11/24.
How much total energy was released by iPTF13ebh, and where did that energy go? Explosion Energetics
Type Ia events are typically associated with a kinetic energy scale of order 10⁵¹ ergs, with little neutrino emission compared to core-collapse. That is a class expectation—not a calorimetry measurement for iPTF13ebh.
How fast are the supernova ejecta and shockwave of iPTF13ebh expanding through space? Explosion Energetics
No ejecta velocity is measured for iPTF13ebh. Blast-wave speed is obtained from Doppler shifts of spectral absorption features (e.g. Si II λ6355 for Type Ia), not from cosmological redshift. Any recession velocity derived from z describes Hubble flow, not the explosion debris. Type Ia events typically show ejecta speeds of order ~11,000 km/s near maximum, but that class scale is not a measurement of iPTF13ebh.
What powers the prolonged glow of iPTF13ebh weeks and months after detonation? Radioactive Engine
After peak, Type Ia light curves are generally powered by the radioactive chain ⁵⁶Ni → ⁵⁶Co → ⁵⁶Fe (half-lives ≈6.1 d and ≈77.2 d). Typical Type Ia events synthesize of order half a solar mass of freshly made Nickel-56 (which later decays into Iron-56); that is a class expectation, not a measured nickel mass for iPTF13ebh. Estimating M(⁵⁶Ni) for this object requires a bolometric light-curve fit that is not published here.
What chemical elements did iPTF13ebh create and disperse into the universe? Nucleosynthesis & Elements
Type Ia explosions are efficient producers of iron-peak elements via thermonuclear burning. Models typically yield substantial ⁵⁶Ni (which decays to stable ⁵⁶Fe), plus silicon, sulfur, calcium, and related species—consistent with the Si II features used in classification. No object-specific nucleosynthetic yield has been published for iPTF13ebh; asserting that this event synthesized half a solar mass of iron would overstate the evidence.
Did iPTF13ebh leave behind a black hole, a neutron star, or nothing at all? Cosmic Remnant
Nothing remains at the center. Because a Type Ia supernova involves the total thermonuclear disruption of the progenitor white dwarf, the entire star was incinerated and flung into space. There is no central neutron star, pulsar, or black hole left behind. The star's entire mass now exists as an expanding gaseous shell traveling through the host galaxy.
What will iPTF13ebh's explosion site look like in 1,000 to 10,000 years? Cosmic Remnant
Supernova remnants in general evolve through free-expansion, Sedov–Taylor, and radiative phases over centuries to millennia, sometimes becoming bright X-ray shells and occasionally compressing nearby molecular clouds. These are standard remnant-evolution models, not forecasts measured for iPTF13ebh. Whether this site will trigger star formation, reach particular X-ray temperatures, or match Cassiopeia A depends on local density and magnetic field—none of which are constrained by the data shown here.
In which galaxy did iPTF13ebh explode, and where is it located relative to the galactic center? Galactic Environment
No host galaxy is identified for iPTF13ebh in this catalog record. A blank host field means the association is unresolved here—it does not establish that the host is uncataloged, resolved in imaging, or securely linked by astrometry. Possible states (unidentified, hostless candidate, imaging detection without a catalog name, or a securely matched cataloged galaxy) require separate evidence that is not present in this field.
Where is iPTF13ebh located in the night sky and which constellation is it in? Sky Coordinates
In the celestial sphere, iPTF13ebh is located at Right Ascension 02:21:59.98 and Declination +33:16:13.7, situated in the constellation Triangulum (The Triangle). Because its declination is +33:16:13.7, it is primarily placed in the Northern celestial hemisphere.
How much Milky Way interstellar dust obscures our view of iPTF13ebh? Interstellar Dust
Along this line of sight, the catalog records a Milky Way foreground color excess of E(B−V) = 0.0668 mag (source: published extinction estimate), corresponding to roughly A_V ≈ 0.21 mag for R_V = 3.1. Band-specific corrections (e.g. A_r) differ from A_V and should be applied when available. Map-based values (IRSA / Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011) must not be claimed unless that map was actually queried.
Across which photometric filter bands was iPTF13ebh monitored? Astronomical Observations
No calibrated photometry is published for iPTF13ebh. Without multi-epoch flux measurements, neither a light curve nor a peak magnitude can be established. Follow-up imaging from survey alert streams would be required to map its brightness evolution.
What did astronomical spectroscopy reveal about iPTF13ebh's chemical makeup? Astronomical Observations
No spectrum has been published for iPTF13ebh. Without spectroscopy, its chemical composition, expansion velocity, and physical classification cannot be established. Classification spectra from follow-up observatories would be required to identify diagnostic absorption and emission lines.
Who discovered iPTF13ebh and how was it first detected? Discovery & History
iPTF13ebh was officially reported on 2013/11/14 by an automated robotic transient sky survey. Discoveries are typically flagged by high-cadence robotic survey telescopes (such as ATLAS, ZTF, Pan-STARRS, ASAS-SN, or Gaia) and worldwide amateur astronomers scanning the night sky, followed by rapid spectroscopic classification by international observatories.
How many scientific publications and observatories have contributed data to iPTF13ebh? Scientific Research
Data for iPTF13ebh are compiled from international astronomical notices, the IAU Transient Name Server (TNS), and peer-reviewed astrophysical journals.
How does iPTF13ebh contribute to measuring the Hubble Constant and the scale of the cosmos? Cosmology & Distance Ladder
Because iPTF13ebh is a Type Ia supernova, it serves as an indispensable rung on the Cosmic Distance Ladder. Astrophysicists utilize the Phillips relation—a tight empirical correlation between peak absolute magnitude and light curve decline rate (Δm₁₅)—to standardize its luminosity. By comparing this calibrated intrinsic brightness with observed apparent magnitude, researchers calculate precise geometric distances across the universe, providing key empirical tests of the Hubble constant (H₀) and dark energy.
Could gravitational waves or neutrinos from iPTF13ebh be detected on Earth? Multi-Messenger Astronomy
For thermonuclear explosions like iPTF13ebh, gravitational wave and neutrino emissions are negligible compared to core-collapse events. However, multi-messenger radio and X-ray observations are crucial: detecting synchrotron radio emission would reveal circumstellar gas shed by a companion star, helping settle the century-old debate between single-degenerate and double-degenerate white dwarf progenitor channels.
How does iPTF13ebh compare to famous historical supernovae like SN 1987A or the Crab Supernova? Historical Comparison
Compared to historical landmarks like SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (168,000 light-years away, naked-eye peak m = 2.9) or the Crab Supernova of 1054 (6,500 light-years away), the distance to iPTF13ebh is not measured, so no such comparison can be drawn. While historical naked-eye supernovae occurred within our Milky Way or its immediate satellites, modern discoveries like iPTF13ebh allow astrophysicists to probe diverse galactic environments, metallicities, and stellar populations across the broader universe.
Can I see iPTF13ebh tonight with a backyard telescope or binoculars? Backyard Observation
Unknown — no measured brightness. iPTF13ebh was discovered 4737 days ago (2013/11/14), but no calibrated photometry is published for it, so its current apparent magnitude cannot be stated. Without a magnitude there is no basis for a telescope-aperture recommendation. Use the coordinates and airmass chart above to plan a follow-up observation and report what you measure.
Does the radiation or shockwave from iPTF13ebh pose any threat to Earth? Planetary Safety
Earth is in no danger from iPTF13ebh. The astrophysical 'lethal kill zone' for a supernova to damage our ozone layer is roughly 50 to 100 light-years. This transient is far outside the solar neighbourhood: it was discovered by a wide-field survey at a magnitude only reachable for an extragalactic object, and any transient in our own galaxy within that radius would have appeared far brighter than the ~18th magnitude reported here. Its exact distance is unmeasured, but the detection brightness alone rules out any nearby threat.
Data sourced from IAU TNS, ALeRCE, WISeREP, and the Open Supernova Catalog.
View All General Astrophysics FAQs →