Host Optical Cutout
0.26″/pix
Pan-STARRS1 DR1 Optical (0.25″/pix)
Core Parameters
| R.A. (J2000) | 10:35:23.520 (158.84800°) |
|---|---|
| Dec. (J2000) | +35:28:14.37 (35.47066°) |
| Spectral Type | — |
| Redshift (z) | — |
| Recession Velocity | — |
| Luminosity Distance | — |
| Peak Apparent Mag | 20.60 brightest multi-epoch detection (2021/01/12) |
| Peak Absolute Mag | — |
| MW Dust E(B-V) | 0.0208 mag derived from galactic coordinates (coordinate model), not a dust-map measurement |
| Host Galaxy | — |
| Host Offset | — |
| Observations | 8 detections, 10 upper limits, 0 spectra |
Interactive Sky Field (Aladin) ✨ DSS2 Optical (China-VO mirror)
🎯 10:35:23.520 +35:28:14.37
FOV: 0.15°
● AT2020aexr (—)
Coordinate Pointing & Airmass
Discovered 5.9 years ago (2020/12/23). Cataloged peak 2021/01/12 (2123d ago; rest-frame phase +2123.0d). Cataloged/observed peak: m = 20.60 on 2021/01/12. Latest observed: m = 20.63 on 2021/01/18 (MJD 59232.4). No reliable current brightness estimate — no event-specific brightness fit with documented uncertainty is published for this object. Class-average decay templates are not used as object-specific predictions. Latest observed magnitude: m = 20.63 on 2021/01/18 (MJD 59232.4). Published upper limits (nondetections) exist in the photometry record. Current brightness trend is unknown (last observation 2021/01/18 (MJD 59232.4); same-band recent pair unavailable or stale). Use the window below to plan observations tonight.
Multi-Band Light Curve
|
Calibrated Spectra Viewer
🌌 Cosmic Neighbors & Contemporaries
105,768+ transients indexed
Cataloged transients closest to AT2020aexr in discovery time, spatial sky neighborhood, and cosmological redshift:
⏱️ Closest in Time
AT2020admg
Exploded same day
Type Afterglow?
2020/12/23
AT2020admp
Exploded same day
Type Candidate
2020/12/23 · Mag 20.5
AT2020admy
Exploded same day
Type Candidate
2020/12/23 · Mag 18.9
🔭 Closest on the Sky
AT2022fih
14.0′ away
Type Candidate
Discovered 2022/03/27
SNhunt15
29.5′ away
Type Transient
Discovered 2010/10/28
AT2018lva
31.9′ away
Type Candidate
Discovered 2018/06/02
🌌 Same Cosmic Era (Redshift)
No redshift match available (target z missing or no comparable redshifts in index).
Literature & Data Provenance
| ID | Source | Reference | NASA ADS Bibcode |
|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | Transient Name Server | — | |
| [2] | 2021TNSTR.743....1C | K. C. Chambers | 2021TNSTR.743....1C |
| [3] | The Open Supernova Catalog | Guillochon et al. (2017) | 2017ApJ...835...64G |
| [4] | ALeRCE / ZTF | — | |
| [5] | Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011) | Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011) | 2011ApJ...737..103S |
❓ Frequently Asked Questions About AT2020aexr
Scientific & observational Q&As indexed from astronomical databases & the Open Supernova Catalog
What type of supernova is AT2020aexr and what kind of star exploded? Astrophysics & Progenitor
AT2020aexr has not been spectroscopically classified. It was reported as an astronomical transient, which means an object was detected changing in brightness, but its nature is not yet established. Classification requires a spectrum: the presence or absence of hydrogen lines separates Type II from Type I, and Type Ia is identified by silicon absorption near 6150 Å combined with the absence of hydrogen. Until such a spectrum is published, claims about the progenitor star or explosion mechanism would be speculation. Check the sources below for follow-up spectroscopy.
What was the progenitor star doing in the millions of years leading up to AT2020aexr? Astrophysics & Progenitor
The progenitor of AT2020aexr cannot be identified without a classification. Stellar evolutionary history depends entirely on the explosion type: a Type Ia event would require a carbon-oxygen white dwarf in a binary system, whereas a core-collapse event would require a massive star exhausting its fuel within tens of millions of years. These are mutually exclusive histories that produce different spectra and light curves. No progenitor or precursor has been reported for this transient in the available literature.
How far away is AT2020aexr from Earth and how old is the light reaching us? Cosmic Distance & Time
The distance to AT2020aexr has not been measured. No spectroscopic redshift or luminosity distance is published for this transient, so neither its distance from Earth nor its lookback time can be stated. A redshift requires a spectrum, and a photometric redshift requires multi-band imaging that has not been reported. Without a distance, its intrinsic luminosity and total energy release are also undetermined. Check the sources below for follow-up spectroscopy or host-galaxy identification.
What does the cosmological redshift of AT2020aexr tell us about the expansion of space? Cosmic Distance & Time
No spectroscopic redshift has been measured for AT2020aexr. Without a published z, its place in the Hubble flow, recession velocity, and lookback time cannot be stated. A redshift requires a spectrum (or a well-calibrated photometric redshift from multi-band imaging). Check the sources below for follow-up spectroscopy.
How bright did AT2020aexr become at its peak, and how many Suns does that equal? Explosion Energetics
At peak brightness, AT2020aexr achieved an apparent magnitude of 20.60 around 2021/01/12.
How much total energy was released by AT2020aexr, and where did that energy go? Explosion Energetics
The total energy released by AT2020aexr is unknown. Energy budgets differ by orders of magnitude depending on mechanism: a thermonuclear Type Ia liberates ~10⁵¹ ergs mostly as kinetic energy, while a core-collapse event liberates ~10⁵³ ergs of which ~99% escapes as neutrinos. Without a spectroscopic classification, neither figure applies to this transient.
How fast are the supernova ejecta and shockwave of AT2020aexr expanding through space? Explosion Energetics
No ejecta velocity is measured for AT2020aexr. Blast-wave speed is obtained from Doppler shifts of spectral absorption features (e.g. Si II λ6355 for Type Ia), not from cosmological redshift. Any recession velocity derived from z describes Hubble flow, not the explosion debris.
What powers the prolonged glow of AT2020aexr weeks and months after detonation? Radioactive Engine
The power source sustaining AT2020aexr cannot be identified without a classification. Classified supernovae are typically powered after peak by the radioactive decay of ⁵⁶Ni → ⁵⁶Co → ⁵⁶Fe, but nickel yields and whether a shock-breakout flash occurred depend on the explosion mechanism. No spectrum is published for this transient, so no ⁵⁶Ni mass or decay-powered light-curve narrative applies.
What chemical elements did AT2020aexr create and disperse into the universe? Nucleosynthesis & Elements
The nucleosynthetic products of AT2020aexr are unknown because its type is unresolved. Element yields depend directly on the explosion mechanism: a thermonuclear Type Ia produces mostly iron-peak elements such as 56Ni and 56Fe, whereas a core-collapse event produces large quantities of oxygen, neon, magnesium and silicon from successive burning shells. No spectrum has been published for this transient, so which of these occurred is not established.
Did AT2020aexr leave behind a black hole, a neutron star, or nothing at all? Cosmic Remnant
Whether AT2020aexr left a remnant is unknown. A thermonuclear Type Ia leaves no compact remnant (the white dwarf is fully disrupted), whereas a core-collapse event leaves a neutron star or black hole depending on progenitor mass. Without a spectroscopic classification, none of these outcomes can be asserted for this transient.
What will AT2020aexr's explosion site look like in 1,000 to 10,000 years? Cosmic Remnant
Supernova remnants in general evolve through free-expansion, Sedov–Taylor, and radiative phases over centuries to millennia, sometimes becoming bright X-ray shells and occasionally compressing nearby molecular clouds. These are standard remnant-evolution models, not forecasts measured for AT2020aexr. Whether this site will trigger star formation, reach particular X-ray temperatures, or match Cassiopeia A depends on local density and magnetic field—none of which are constrained by the data shown here.
In which galaxy did AT2020aexr explode, and where is it located relative to the galactic center? Galactic Environment
No host galaxy is identified for AT2020aexr in this catalog record. A blank host field means the association is unresolved here—it does not establish that the host is uncataloged, resolved in imaging, or securely linked by astrometry. Possible states (unidentified, hostless candidate, imaging detection without a catalog name, or a securely matched cataloged galaxy) require separate evidence that is not present in this field.
Where is AT2020aexr located in the night sky and which constellation is it in? Sky Coordinates
In the celestial sphere, AT2020aexr is located at Right Ascension 10:35:23.520 and Declination +35:28:14.37, situated in the constellation Leo Minor (The Lesser Lion). Because its declination is +35:28:14.37, it is primarily placed in the Northern celestial hemisphere.
How much Milky Way interstellar dust obscures our view of AT2020aexr? Interstellar Dust
Along this line of sight, the catalog records a Milky Way foreground color excess of E(B−V) = 0.0208 mag (source: 5), corresponding to roughly A_V ≈ 0.06 mag for R_V = 3.1. Band-specific corrections (e.g. A_r) differ from A_V and should be applied when available. Map-based values (IRSA / Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011) must not be claimed unless that map was actually queried.
Across which photometric filter bands was AT2020aexr monitored? Astronomical Observations
AT2020aexr was tracked across 18 photometric observations across a baseline of 29.0 days utilizing filter bands including
g, r. Data were captured by observatories and survey networks including ZTF. Multi-color photometry tracks the temperature evolution of the fireball, verifying the rise time to peak and the rate of radioactive decline.What did astronomical spectroscopy reveal about AT2020aexr's chemical makeup? Astronomical Observations
No spectrum has been published for AT2020aexr. Without spectroscopy, its chemical composition, expansion velocity, and physical classification cannot be established. Classification spectra from follow-up observatories would be required to identify diagnostic absorption and emission lines.
Who discovered AT2020aexr and how was it first detected? Discovery & History
AT2020aexr was officially reported on 2020/12/23 by K. C. Chambers, T. de Boer, J. Bulger, J. Fairlamb, M. Huber, C.-C. Lin, T. Lowe, E. Magnier, A. Schultz, R. J. Wainscoat, M. Willman (IfA, University of Hawaii), K. W. Smith, D. R. Young, O. McBrien, J. Gillanders, S. Srivastav, M. Fulton, S. J. Smartt, D. O'Neill, P. Clark, S. Sim (Queen's University Belfast), D. E. Wright (University of Minnesota). Discoveries are typically flagged by high-cadence robotic survey telescopes (such as ATLAS, ZTF, Pan-STARRS, ASAS-SN, or Gaia) and worldwide amateur astronomers scanning the night sky, followed by rapid spectroscopic classification by international observatories.
How many scientific publications and observatories have contributed data to AT2020aexr? Scientific Research
AT2020aexr is documented across 5 scientific references and archival data sources in the Open Supernova Catalog. These include discovery circulars and research datasets from Transient Name Server, 2021TNSTR.743....1C, The Open Supernova Catalog, ALeRCE / ZTF. All raw photometry and spectroscopy points are cross-indexed to their original bibliographic records for peer-reviewed verification.
What other names and survey identifiers exist for AT2020aexr? Cross-Identifications
Throughout global alert streams and survey databases, AT2020aexr has also been designated as:
PS21bjy, 2020aexr, SN2020aexr, AT 2020aexr, ZTF21aagaadt. These cross-matched identifiers allow astronomers to cross-reference observations across the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS), Pan-STARRS, Gaia Photometric Science Alerts, and the IAU Transient Name Server (TNS).How does AT2020aexr contribute to measuring the Hubble Constant and the scale of the cosmos? Cosmology & Distance Ladder
AT2020aexr cannot currently be used for cosmological distance work because its classification is unresolved. The distance ladder relies on type-specific techniques: Type Ia supernovae use the Phillips relation between peak absolute magnitude and decline rate, while Type II events use the Expanding Photosphere Method or SCM-II. An unclassified transient fits neither, so no Hubble-constant constraint can be derived from it until a spectrum establishes its type.
Could gravitational waves or neutrinos from AT2020aexr be detected on Earth? Multi-Messenger Astronomy
No neutrino or gravitational-wave counterpart has been reported for AT2020aexr, and none is expected to be identifiable without a classification. The multi-messenger signature differs sharply by type: core-collapse events emit a neutrino burst at shock breakout (detected once, for SN 1987A), while thermonuclear Type Ia events produce negligible neutrinos and gravitational waves. Searching for a counterpart before knowing which mechanism applies would be unfocused.
How does AT2020aexr compare to famous historical supernovae like SN 1987A or the Crab Supernova? Historical Comparison
Compared to historical landmarks like SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (168,000 light-years away, naked-eye peak m = 2.9) or the Crab Supernova of 1054 (6,500 light-years away), the distance to AT2020aexr is not established for a historical comparison (unclassified; no redshift or luminosity distance is published). While historical naked-eye supernovae occurred within our Milky Way or its immediate satellites, modern discoveries like AT2020aexr allow astrophysicists to probe diverse galactic environments, metallicities, and stellar populations across the broader universe.
Can I see AT2020aexr tonight with a backyard telescope or binoculars? Backyard Observation
Unknown — no measured brightness. AT2020aexr was discovered 2143 days ago (2020/12/23), but no calibrated photometry is published for it, so its current apparent magnitude cannot be stated. Without a magnitude there is no basis for a telescope-aperture recommendation. Use the coordinates and airmass chart above to plan a follow-up observation and report what you measure.
Does the radiation or shockwave from AT2020aexr pose any threat to Earth? Planetary Safety
Earth is in no danger from AT2020aexr. The astrophysical 'lethal kill zone' for a supernova to damage our ozone layer is roughly 50 to 100 light-years. This transient is far outside the solar neighbourhood: it was discovered by a wide-field survey at a magnitude only reachable for an extragalactic object, and any transient in our own galaxy within that radius would have appeared far brighter than the ~18th magnitude reported here. Its exact distance is unmeasured, but the detection brightness alone rules out any nearby threat.
Data sourced from IAU TNS, ALeRCE, WISeREP, and the Open Supernova Catalog.
View All General Astrophysics FAQs →