Host Optical Cutout
0.26″/pix
Pan-STARRS1 DR1 Optical (0.25″/pix)
Core Parameters
| R.A. (J2000) | 14:03:03.300 (210.76375°) |
|---|---|
| Dec. (J2000) | +51:59:45.93 (51.99609°) |
| Spectral Type | removed |
| Redshift (z) | — |
| Recession Velocity | — |
| Luminosity Distance | — |
| Reported Magnitude | 19.4 Peak magnitude: Not established |
| Peak Absolute Mag | — |
| MW Dust E(B-V) | 0.0119 mag |
| Host Galaxy | — |
| Host Offset | — |
| Observations | 0 detections, 0 spectra |
Interactive Sky Field (Aladin) ✨ DSS2 Optical (China-VO mirror)
🎯 14:03:03.300 +51:59:45.93
FOV: 0.15°
● AT2018bly (removed)
Coordinate Pointing & Airmass
Brightness not measured: discovered 8.7 years ago (2018/03/17). No calibrated photometry is published. No reliable current brightness estimate is available.
Multi-Band Light Curve
|
Calibrated Spectra Viewer
🌌 Cosmic Neighbors & Contemporaries
105,868+ transients indexed
Cataloged transients closest to AT2018bly in discovery time, spatial sky neighborhood, and cosmological redshift:
⏱️ Closest in Time
AT2018ahf
Exploded same day
Type Candidate
2018/03/17 · Mag 18.7
AT2018ahp
Exploded same day
Type Candidate
2018/03/17 · Mag 18.6
AT2018ahl
Exploded same day
Type Candidate
2018/03/17 · Mag 18.9
🔭 Closest on the Sky
CSS150325:140426+514417
20.1′ away
Type Ic
Discovered 2015/03/25
AT2018bnm
21.4′ away
Type removed
Discovered 2018/03/17
PS1-14tz
41.3′ away
Type Transient
Discovered 2014/03/19
🌌 Same Cosmic Era (Redshift)
No redshift match available (target z missing or no comparable redshifts in index).
Literature & Data Provenance
| ID | Source | Reference | NASA ADS Bibcode |
|---|---|---|---|
| No sources recorded. | |||
❓ Frequently Asked Questions About AT2018bly
Scientific & observational Q&As indexed from astronomical databases & the sne.space
What type of supernova is AT2018bly and what kind of star exploded? Astrophysics & Progenitor
AT2018bly is cataloged as a Type removed transient. Mechanism-specific claims (progenitor mass, nickel yield, remnant type) require more than this label and are not asserted here as object-specific measurements.
What was the progenitor star doing in the millions of years leading up to AT2018bly? Astrophysics & Progenitor
The specific progenitor of AT2018bly has not been observed. Events of this spectroscopic class are generally associated with massive-star core collapse after successive nuclear burning stages (hydrogen → helium → carbon → neon → oxygen → silicon → iron). Typical lifetimes of such progenitors are tens of millions of years, but that is a class expectation—not a measured age or evolutionary track for this star. No pre-explosion imaging identification is cited in the available record for AT2018bly.
How far away is AT2018bly from Earth and how old is the light reaching us? Cosmic Distance & Time
The distance to AT2018bly has not been measured. No spectroscopic redshift or luminosity distance is published for this transient, so neither its distance from Earth nor its lookback time can be stated. A redshift requires a spectrum, and a photometric redshift requires multi-band imaging that has not been reported. Without a distance, its intrinsic luminosity and total energy release are also undetermined. Check the sources below for follow-up spectroscopy or host-galaxy identification.
What does the cosmological redshift of AT2018bly tell us about the expansion of space? Cosmic Distance & Time
No spectroscopic redshift has been measured for AT2018bly. Without a published z, its place in the Hubble flow, recession velocity, and lookback time cannot be stated. A redshift requires a spectrum (or a well-calibrated photometric redshift from multi-band imaging). Check the sources below for follow-up spectroscopy.
How bright did AT2018bly become at its peak, and how many Suns does that equal? Explosion Energetics
At peak brightness, AT2018bly achieved an apparent magnitude of 19.4 around 2018/03/17.
How much total energy was released by AT2018bly, and where did that energy go? Explosion Energetics
Core-collapse events of this broad class are often discussed with a ~10⁵³ erg gravitational binding energy of which ~99% may escape as neutrinos—again a class scale, not a measured budget for AT2018bly.
How fast are the supernova ejecta and shockwave of AT2018bly expanding through space? Explosion Energetics
No ejecta velocity is measured for AT2018bly. Blast-wave speed is obtained from Doppler shifts of spectral absorption features (e.g. Si II λ6355 for Type Ia), not from cosmological redshift. Any recession velocity derived from z describes Hubble flow, not the explosion debris.
What powers the prolonged glow of AT2018bly weeks and months after detonation? Radioactive Engine
Classified core-collapse light curves are often sustained after peak by radioactive ⁵⁶Ni → ⁵⁶Co → ⁵⁶Fe decay, with typical nickel yields of order 0.05–0.15 solar masses—again a class scale, not a measured yield for AT2018bly. Shock-breakout heating may dominate the earliest optical flash; without a published bolometric fit, neither nickel mass nor the dominant power source is established for this event.
What chemical elements did AT2018bly create and disperse into the universe? Nucleosynthesis & Elements
The nucleosynthetic products of AT2018bly are unknown because its type is unresolved. Element yields depend directly on the explosion mechanism: a thermonuclear Type Ia produces mostly iron-peak elements such as 56Ni and 56Fe, whereas a core-collapse event produces large quantities of oxygen, neon, magnesium and silicon from successive burning shells. No spectrum has been published for this transient, so which of these occurred is not established.
Did AT2018bly leave behind a black hole, a neutron star, or nothing at all? Cosmic Remnant
A core-collapse explosion associated with AT2018bly's class forges an ultra-dense compact stellar remnant at the center of the detonation. If the progenitor had an initial mass under ~20 solar masses, it left behind a neutron star (pulsar)—packing the mass of our entire Sun into a city-sized sphere barely 20 kilometers wide, spinning dozens or hundreds of times per second. If the progenitor exceeded ~25–30 solar masses, gravity overcame neutron degeneracy pressure, creating a permanent stellar-mass black hole.
What will AT2018bly's explosion site look like in 1,000 to 10,000 years? Cosmic Remnant
Supernova remnants in general evolve through free-expansion, Sedov–Taylor, and radiative phases over centuries to millennia, sometimes becoming bright X-ray shells and occasionally compressing nearby molecular clouds. These are standard remnant-evolution models, not forecasts measured for AT2018bly. Whether this site will trigger star formation, reach particular X-ray temperatures, or match Cassiopeia A depends on local density and magnetic field—none of which are constrained by the data shown here.
In which galaxy did AT2018bly explode, and where is it located relative to the galactic center? Galactic Environment
No host galaxy is identified for AT2018bly in this catalog record. A blank host field means the association is unresolved here—it does not establish that the host is uncataloged, resolved in imaging, or securely linked by astrometry. Possible states (unidentified, hostless candidate, imaging detection without a catalog name, or a securely matched cataloged galaxy) require separate evidence that is not present in this field.
Where is AT2018bly located in the night sky and which constellation is it in? Sky Coordinates
In the celestial sphere, AT2018bly is located at Right Ascension 14:03:03.300 and Declination +51:59:45.93, situated in the constellation Canes Venatici (The Hunting Dogs). Because its declination is +51:59:45.93, it is primarily placed in the Northern celestial hemisphere.
How much Milky Way interstellar dust obscures our view of AT2018bly? Interstellar Dust
Along this line of sight, the catalog records a Milky Way foreground color excess of E(B−V) = 0.0119 mag (source: published extinction estimate), corresponding to roughly A_V ≈ 0.04 mag for R_V = 3.1. Band-specific corrections (e.g. A_r) differ from A_V and should be applied when available. Map-based values (IRSA / Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011) must not be claimed unless that map was actually queried.
Across which photometric filter bands was AT2018bly monitored? Astronomical Observations
No calibrated photometry is published for AT2018bly. Without multi-epoch flux measurements, neither a light curve nor a peak magnitude can be established. Follow-up imaging from survey alert streams would be required to map its brightness evolution.
What did astronomical spectroscopy reveal about AT2018bly's chemical makeup? Astronomical Observations
No spectrum has been published for AT2018bly. Without spectroscopy, its chemical composition, expansion velocity, and physical classification cannot be established. Classification spectra from follow-up observatories would be required to identify diagnostic absorption and emission lines.
Who discovered AT2018bly and how was it first detected? Discovery & History
AT2018bly was officially reported on 2018/03/17 by ATLAS. Discoveries are typically flagged by high-cadence robotic survey telescopes (such as ATLAS, ZTF, Pan-STARRS, ASAS-SN, or Gaia) and worldwide amateur astronomers scanning the night sky, followed by rapid spectroscopic classification by international observatories.
How many scientific publications and observatories have contributed data to AT2018bly? Scientific Research
Data for AT2018bly are compiled from international astronomical notices, the IAU Transient Name Server (TNS), and peer-reviewed astrophysical journals.
What other names and survey identifiers exist for AT2018bly? Cross-Identifications
Throughout global alert streams and survey databases, AT2018bly has also been designated as:
ATLAS18olg. These cross-matched identifiers allow astronomers to cross-reference observations across the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS), Pan-STARRS, Gaia Photometric Science Alerts, and the IAU Transient Name Server (TNS).How does AT2018bly contribute to measuring the Hubble Constant and the scale of the cosmos? Cosmology & Distance Ladder
AT2018bly cannot currently be used for cosmological distance work because its classification is unresolved. The distance ladder relies on type-specific techniques: Type Ia supernovae use the Phillips relation between peak absolute magnitude and decline rate, while Type II events use the Expanding Photosphere Method or SCM-II. An unclassified transient fits neither, so no Hubble-constant constraint can be derived from it until a spectrum establishes its type.
Could gravitational waves or neutrinos from AT2018bly be detected on Earth? Multi-Messenger Astronomy
No neutrino or gravitational-wave counterpart has been reported for AT2018bly, and none is expected to be identifiable without a classification. The multi-messenger signature differs sharply by type: core-collapse events emit a neutrino burst at shock breakout (detected once, for SN 1987A), while thermonuclear Type Ia events produce negligible neutrinos and gravitational waves. Searching for a counterpart before knowing which mechanism applies would be unfocused.
How does AT2018bly compare to famous historical supernovae like SN 1987A or the Crab Supernova? Historical Comparison
Compared to historical landmarks like SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (168,000 light-years away, naked-eye peak m = 2.9) or the Crab Supernova of 1054 (6,500 light-years away), the distance to AT2018bly is not measured, so no such comparison can be drawn. While historical naked-eye supernovae occurred within our Milky Way or its immediate satellites, modern discoveries like AT2018bly allow astrophysicists to probe diverse galactic environments, metallicities, and stellar populations across the broader universe.
Can I see AT2018bly tonight with a backyard telescope or binoculars? Backyard Observation
Unknown — no measured brightness. AT2018bly was discovered 3165 days ago (2018/03/17), but no calibrated photometry is published for it, so its current apparent magnitude cannot be stated. Without a magnitude there is no basis for a telescope-aperture recommendation. Use the coordinates and airmass chart above to plan a follow-up observation and report what you measure.
Does the radiation or shockwave from AT2018bly pose any threat to Earth? Planetary Safety
Earth is in no danger from AT2018bly. The astrophysical 'lethal kill zone' for a supernova to damage our ozone layer is roughly 50 to 100 light-years. This transient is far outside the solar neighbourhood: it was discovered by a wide-field survey at a magnitude only reachable for an extragalactic object, and any transient in our own galaxy within that radius would have appeared far brighter than the ~18th magnitude reported here. Its exact distance is unmeasured, but the detection brightness alone rules out any nearby threat.
Data sourced from IAU TNS, ALeRCE, WISeREP, and the sne.space.
View All General Astrophysics FAQs →