sne.space
📡 Radar ❓ FAQs
🔭 Pro Cockpit 📖 Story View
Type removed Supernova

The Story of Supernova AT2018bll

An extraordinary stellar explosion that occurred Millions of Light-Years away in deep space.

⏱️ ~6 min deep read 🔬 24 Astrophysical Q&As 🔭 Viewing Guide Included 🪐 Constellation Boötes
🔭 Deep Field (~2.1′ FOV) · DSS2 Optical (China-VO mirror)
● AT2018bll Explosion Site

High-magnification deep optical view into AT2018bll's host environment. Pan and scroll to explore the cosmic neighborhood where this star exploded.

⚡ Quick Observer Facts & Telemetry

IAU Transients DB
🌐 Distance to Earth
Millions of Light-Years
Lookback Cosmic Time
✨ Peak Brightness
Mag 19.4
Large Observatory
☀️ Peak Radiance
Hundreds of Millions of Suns
Combined Stellar Energy
🚀 Shock Velocity
Not measured
No spectral ejecta velocity
🌌 Host Galaxy
2MASX J14045835+3838034
Offset: 0.47″
🧭 Constellation
Boötes
The Herdsman
💥 Explosion Physics
Type removed
Core-Collapse Supergiant
📅 Discovered On
2018/04/12
ATLAS
CHAPTER I

A Core-Collapse Class Transient

On 2018/04/12, astronomers scanning the heavens flagged a sudden, violent pinpoint of light that had flared into visibility. Designated AT2018bll, it represents a catastrophic stellar explosion classified as a Type removed supernova.

AT2018bll is classified in a core-collapse spectroscopic family. Events of this class are generally linked to the death of a massive star after successive nuclear burning stages, but no unique progenitor mass, lifetime, or pre-explosion identification is established for this object. The narrative of onion-shell fusion ending in iron-core collapse describes the class model, not a measured biography of AT2018bll.

Astrophysical Mechanism Summary
Type: Type removed • Progenitor: Massive Red/Stripped Supergiant Star • Velocity: Not measured
CHAPTER II

A Message Across Deep Cosmic Time

AT2018bll has a luminosity distance of approximately Millions of Light-Years . Lookback time is unavailable without a usable redshift; do not equate luminosity distance with travel time.

Luminosity distance incorporates cosmic expansion and exceeds the light-travel distance. The two quantities must be reported separately.

CHAPTER III

Brightness Record

At the height of the outburst around 2018/04/12, AT2018bll surged to a peak apparent magnitude of 19.4.

The total energy released by the cataclysm was on the order of 10⁵¹ to 10⁵³ ergs. Over 99% of this energy was emitted within the first 10 seconds as a dense burst of trillions of neutrinos, with only 1% driving the visible blast wave.

CHAPTER IV

The Radioactive Furnace: Why Supernovae Glow for Months

After peak, many supernovae are powered by the radioactive chain ⁵⁶Ni → ⁵⁶Co → ⁵⁶Fe. That is the standard model for Type removed light curves; an object-specific nickel mass for AT2018bll is not published here.

Nickel-56 decays to Cobalt-56 (half-life ≈6.1 days), then to stable Iron-56 (half-life ≈77.2 days), heating the ejecta from within. Typical class yields must not be quoted as measured values for this event.

CHAPTER V

Cosmic Kiln: Seeding the Elements of Life

Supernovae enrich galaxies with heavy elements. Events of AT2018bll's class are associated with oxygen-group and intermediate-mass products (O, C, Ne, Mg, Si) in galactic chemical-evolution models. No measured elemental yields are published for AT2018bll.

As Carl Sagan observed, "We are made of star-stuff" — a statement about nucleosynthesis in general, not a claim that atoms from this specific remnant are identified in the Solar System.

CHAPTER VI

Galactic Setting in Boötes

AT2018bll is associated with cataloged host 2MASX J14045835+3838034 , at an offset of 0.47″ from the reported galactic center. In our terrestrial sky, it resides in the constellation Boötes (The Herdsman) at Right Ascension 14:04:58.390 and Declination +38:38:03.41.

CHAPTER VII

The Scientific Surveillance Campaign

Following its discovery by ATLAS, observatories worldwide swung their lenses toward AT2018bll. In the sne.space, AT2018bll is documented across 0 photometric measurements and 0 spectroscopic epochs. These multi-wavelength observations allow astrophysicists to model the expanding photosphere, measure shock velocities, and probe circumstellar interactions.

CHAPTER VIII

Stargazer's Field Guide: Can You See It Tonight?

Can I see it tonight? Unknown — no measured brightness.

Discovered 8.6 years ago (2018/04/12). No reliable current brightness estimate — no photometry has been published.

Planetary Safety Note: Even though AT2018bll was a titanic explosion, our planet sits safely outside the lethal 50–100 light-year kill zone. At a distance of Millions of Light-Years, the blast poses zero physical hazard to Earth's biosphere.

🌌 Cosmic Neighbors & Contemporaries 105,868+ transients indexed

Cataloged transients closest to AT2018bll in discovery time, spatial sky neighborhood, and cosmological redshift:

⏱️ Closest in Time
AT2018bab Exploded same day
Type Candidate 2018/04/12 · Mag 18.7
AT2018bar Exploded same day
Type Candidate 2018/04/12 · Mag 18.9
AT2018bca Exploded same day
Type Candidate 2018/04/12 · Mag 18.7
🔭 Closest on the Sky
SN2025kzb 16.5′ away
Type Ia Discovered 2025/05/21
SN2021adpe 20.7′ away
Type Ia Discovered 2021/11/04
SN2007fg 31.0′ away
Type II Discovered 2007/07/03
🌌 Same Cosmic Era (Redshift)
No redshift match available (target z missing or no comparable redshifts in index).

❓ Frequently Asked Questions About AT2018bll

Scientific & observational Q&As indexed from astronomical databases & the sne.space
🔍 24 of 24
What type of supernova is AT2018bll and what kind of star exploded? Astrophysics & Progenitor
AT2018bll is cataloged as a Type removed transient. Mechanism-specific claims (progenitor mass, nickel yield, remnant type) require more than this label and are not asserted here as object-specific measurements.
What was the progenitor star doing in the millions of years leading up to AT2018bll? Astrophysics & Progenitor
The specific progenitor of AT2018bll has not been observed. Events of this spectroscopic class are generally associated with massive-star core collapse after successive nuclear burning stages (hydrogen → helium → carbon → neon → oxygen → silicon → iron). Typical lifetimes of such progenitors are tens of millions of years, but that is a class expectation—not a measured age or evolutionary track for this star. No pre-explosion imaging identification is cited in the available record for AT2018bll.
How far away is AT2018bll from Earth and how old is the light reaching us? Cosmic Distance & Time
The distance to AT2018bll has not been measured. No spectroscopic redshift or luminosity distance is published for this transient, so neither its distance from Earth nor its lookback time can be stated. A redshift requires a spectrum, and a photometric redshift requires multi-band imaging that has not been reported. Without a distance, its intrinsic luminosity and total energy release are also undetermined. Check the sources below for follow-up spectroscopy or host-galaxy identification.
What does the cosmological redshift of AT2018bll tell us about the expansion of space? Cosmic Distance & Time
No spectroscopic redshift has been measured for AT2018bll. Without a published z, its place in the Hubble flow, recession velocity, and lookback time cannot be stated. A redshift requires a spectrum (or a well-calibrated photometric redshift from multi-band imaging). Check the sources below for follow-up spectroscopy.
How bright did AT2018bll become at its peak, and how many Suns does that equal? Explosion Energetics
At peak brightness, AT2018bll achieved an apparent magnitude of 19.4 around 2018/04/12.
How much total energy was released by AT2018bll, and where did that energy go? Explosion Energetics
Core-collapse events of this broad class are often discussed with a ~10⁵³ erg gravitational binding energy of which ~99% may escape as neutrinos—again a class scale, not a measured budget for AT2018bll.
How fast are the supernova ejecta and shockwave of AT2018bll expanding through space? Explosion Energetics
No ejecta velocity is measured for AT2018bll. Blast-wave speed is obtained from Doppler shifts of spectral absorption features (e.g. Si II λ6355 for Type Ia), not from cosmological redshift. Any recession velocity derived from z describes Hubble flow, not the explosion debris.
What powers the prolonged glow of AT2018bll weeks and months after detonation? Radioactive Engine
Classified core-collapse light curves are often sustained after peak by radioactive ⁵⁶Ni → ⁵⁶Co → ⁵⁶Fe decay, with typical nickel yields of order 0.05–0.15 solar masses—again a class scale, not a measured yield for AT2018bll. Shock-breakout heating may dominate the earliest optical flash; without a published bolometric fit, neither nickel mass nor the dominant power source is established for this event.
What chemical elements did AT2018bll create and disperse into the universe? Nucleosynthesis & Elements
The nucleosynthetic products of AT2018bll are unknown because its type is unresolved. Element yields depend directly on the explosion mechanism: a thermonuclear Type Ia produces mostly iron-peak elements such as 56Ni and 56Fe, whereas a core-collapse event produces large quantities of oxygen, neon, magnesium and silicon from successive burning shells. No spectrum has been published for this transient, so which of these occurred is not established.
Did AT2018bll leave behind a black hole, a neutron star, or nothing at all? Cosmic Remnant
A core-collapse explosion associated with AT2018bll's class forges an ultra-dense compact stellar remnant at the center of the detonation. If the progenitor had an initial mass under ~20 solar masses, it left behind a neutron star (pulsar)—packing the mass of our entire Sun into a city-sized sphere barely 20 kilometers wide, spinning dozens or hundreds of times per second. If the progenitor exceeded ~25–30 solar masses, gravity overcame neutron degeneracy pressure, creating a permanent stellar-mass black hole.
What will AT2018bll's explosion site look like in 1,000 to 10,000 years? Cosmic Remnant
Supernova remnants in general evolve through free-expansion, Sedov–Taylor, and radiative phases over centuries to millennia, sometimes becoming bright X-ray shells and occasionally compressing nearby molecular clouds. These are standard remnant-evolution models, not forecasts measured for AT2018bll. Whether this site will trigger star formation, reach particular X-ray temperatures, or match Cassiopeia A depends on local density and magnetic field—none of which are constrained by the data shown here.
In which galaxy did AT2018bll explode, and where is it located relative to the galactic center? Galactic Environment
AT2018bll is associated with cataloged host 2MASX J14045835+3838034 at an angular/physical offset of 0.47″ from the reported galactic center. That offset places the transient in the host's projected light distribution; it does not by itself prove which stellar population produced the progenitor.
Where is AT2018bll located in the night sky and which constellation is it in? Sky Coordinates
In the celestial sphere, AT2018bll is located at Right Ascension 14:04:58.390 and Declination +38:38:03.41, situated in the constellation Boötes (The Herdsman). Because its declination is +38:38:03.41, it is primarily placed in the Northern celestial hemisphere.
How much Milky Way interstellar dust obscures our view of AT2018bll? Interstellar Dust
Along this line of sight, the catalog records a Milky Way foreground color excess of E(B−V) = 0.0054 mag (source: published extinction estimate), corresponding to roughly A_V ≈ 0.02 mag for R_V = 3.1. Band-specific corrections (e.g. A_r) differ from A_V and should be applied when available. Map-based values (IRSA / Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011) must not be claimed unless that map was actually queried.
Across which photometric filter bands was AT2018bll monitored? Astronomical Observations
No calibrated photometry is published for AT2018bll. Without multi-epoch flux measurements, neither a light curve nor a peak magnitude can be established. Follow-up imaging from survey alert streams would be required to map its brightness evolution.
What did astronomical spectroscopy reveal about AT2018bll's chemical makeup? Astronomical Observations
No spectrum has been published for AT2018bll. Without spectroscopy, its chemical composition, expansion velocity, and physical classification cannot be established. Classification spectra from follow-up observatories would be required to identify diagnostic absorption and emission lines.
Who discovered AT2018bll and how was it first detected? Discovery & History
AT2018bll was officially reported on 2018/04/12 by ATLAS. Discoveries are typically flagged by high-cadence robotic survey telescopes (such as ATLAS, ZTF, Pan-STARRS, ASAS-SN, or Gaia) and worldwide amateur astronomers scanning the night sky, followed by rapid spectroscopic classification by international observatories.
How many scientific publications and observatories have contributed data to AT2018bll? Scientific Research
Data for AT2018bll are compiled from international astronomical notices, the IAU Transient Name Server (TNS), and peer-reviewed astrophysical journals.
What other names and survey identifiers exist for AT2018bll? Cross-Identifications
Throughout global alert streams and survey databases, AT2018bll has also been designated as: ATLAS18olf. These cross-matched identifiers allow astronomers to cross-reference observations across the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS), Pan-STARRS, Gaia Photometric Science Alerts, and the IAU Transient Name Server (TNS).
How does AT2018bll contribute to measuring the Hubble Constant and the scale of the cosmos? Cosmology & Distance Ladder
AT2018bll cannot currently be used for cosmological distance work because its classification is unresolved. The distance ladder relies on type-specific techniques: Type Ia supernovae use the Phillips relation between peak absolute magnitude and decline rate, while Type II events use the Expanding Photosphere Method or SCM-II. An unclassified transient fits neither, so no Hubble-constant constraint can be derived from it until a spectrum establishes its type.
Could gravitational waves or neutrinos from AT2018bll be detected on Earth? Multi-Messenger Astronomy
No neutrino or gravitational-wave counterpart has been reported for AT2018bll, and none is expected to be identifiable without a classification. The multi-messenger signature differs sharply by type: core-collapse events emit a neutrino burst at shock breakout (detected once, for SN 1987A), while thermonuclear Type Ia events produce negligible neutrinos and gravitational waves. Searching for a counterpart before knowing which mechanism applies would be unfocused.
How does AT2018bll compare to famous historical supernovae like SN 1987A or the Crab Supernova? Historical Comparison
Compared to historical landmarks like SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (168,000 light-years away, naked-eye peak m = 2.9) or the Crab Supernova of 1054 (6,500 light-years away), the distance to AT2018bll is not measured, so no such comparison can be drawn. While historical naked-eye supernovae occurred within our Milky Way or its immediate satellites, modern discoveries like AT2018bll allow astrophysicists to probe diverse galactic environments, metallicities, and stellar populations across the broader universe.
Can I see AT2018bll tonight with a backyard telescope or binoculars? Backyard Observation
Unknown — no measured brightness. AT2018bll was discovered 3139 days ago (2018/04/12), but no calibrated photometry is published for it, so its current apparent magnitude cannot be stated. Without a magnitude there is no basis for a telescope-aperture recommendation. Use the coordinates and airmass chart above to plan a follow-up observation and report what you measure.
Does the radiation or shockwave from AT2018bll pose any threat to Earth? Planetary Safety
Earth is in no danger from AT2018bll. The astrophysical 'lethal kill zone' for a supernova to damage our ozone layer is roughly 50 to 100 light-years. This transient is far outside the solar neighbourhood: it was discovered by a wide-field survey at a magnitude only reachable for an extragalactic object, and any transient in our own galaxy within that radius would have appeared far brighter than the ~18th magnitude reported here. Its exact distance is unmeasured, but the detection brightness alone rules out any nearby threat.
Data sourced from IAU TNS, ALeRCE, WISeREP, and the sne.space. View All General Astrophysics FAQs →
View Full Scientific Data & Plots in Pro Cockpit →