Host Optical Cutout
0.26″/pix
DESI DR10 Optical (0.26″/pix)
Core Parameters
| R.A. (J2000) | 15:08:26.209 (227.10920°) |
|---|---|
| Dec. (J2000) | +27:12:02.64 (27.20073°) |
| Spectral Type | Candidate |
| Redshift (z) | 0.076808 |
| Recession Velocity | 22145 km/s (redshift Doppler-equivalent) |
| Luminosity Distance | 359.425 Mpc (~1135.0 Million Light-Years, μ = 37.71) |
| Reported Magnitude | 22.2 Peak magnitude: Not established |
| Peak Absolute Mag | -15.4977 |
| MW Dust E(B-V) | 0.0388 mag (AV = 0.12 mag) derived from galactic coordinates (Analytical Galactic Disk Model (IAU)), not a dust-map measurement |
| Host Galaxy | — |
| Host Offset | — |
| Observations | 0 detections, 0 spectra |
Interactive Sky Field (Aladin) ✨ DSS2 Optical (China-VO mirror)
🎯 15:08:26.209 +27:12:02.64
FOV: 0.15°
● AT2017kem (Candidate)
Coordinate Pointing & Airmass
Brightness not measured: discovered 9.6 years ago (2017/03/28). No calibrated photometry is published. No reliable current brightness estimate is available.
Multi-Band Light Curve
|
Calibrated Spectra Viewer
🌌 Cosmic Neighbors & Contemporaries
105,868+ transients indexed
Cataloged transients closest to AT2017kem in discovery time, spatial sky neighborhood, and cosmological redshift:
⏱️ Closest in Time
AT2017cvo
Exploded same day
Type Candidate
2017/03/28 · Mag 19.58
AT2017kdx
Exploded same day
Type Candidate
2017/03/28 · Mag 22.3
AT2017czz
Exploded same day
Type Candidate
2017/03/28 · Mag 20.7
Literature & Data Provenance
| ID | Source | Reference | NASA ADS Bibcode |
|---|---|---|---|
| No sources recorded. | |||
❓ Frequently Asked Questions About AT2017kem
Scientific & observational Q&As indexed from astronomical databases & the sne.space
What type of supernova is AT2017kem and what kind of star exploded? Astrophysics & Progenitor
AT2017kem has not been spectroscopically classified. It was reported as an astronomical transient, which means an object was detected changing in brightness, but its nature is not yet established. Classification requires a spectrum: the presence or absence of hydrogen lines separates Type II from Type I, and Type Ia is identified by silicon absorption near 6150 Å combined with the absence of hydrogen. Until such a spectrum is published, claims about the progenitor star or explosion mechanism would be speculation. Check the sources below for follow-up spectroscopy.
What was the progenitor star doing in the millions of years leading up to AT2017kem? Astrophysics & Progenitor
The progenitor of AT2017kem cannot be identified without a classification. Stellar evolutionary history depends entirely on the explosion type: a Type Ia event would require a carbon-oxygen white dwarf in a binary system, whereas a core-collapse event would require a massive star exhausting its fuel within tens of millions of years. These are mutually exclusive histories that produce different spectra and light curves. No progenitor or precursor has been reported for this transient in the available literature.
How far away is AT2017kem from Earth and how old is the light reaching us? Cosmic Distance & Time
AT2017kem has a luminosity distance of approximately 1172.3 Million Light-Years (redshift z = 0.076808, d_L = 359.425 Mpc). Under a flat ΛCDM cosmology (H₀≈70 km/s/Mpc, Ωₘ≈0.3), the corresponding lookback time is ≈1016 Myr — when the light set out 1015.8 million years ago in deep Precambrian time, well before multicellular animals dominated Earth. Luminosity distance is larger than the light-travel distance because cosmic expansion stretches the path; the two must not be equated.
What does the cosmological redshift of AT2017kem tell us about the expansion of space? Cosmic Distance & Time
AT2017kem exhibits a measured spectroscopic redshift of z = 0.0768. The cockpit reports a user-facing recession velocity of 22,144.6 km/s, computed as the redshift Doppler-equivalent v = c·((1+z)²−1)/((1+z)²+1). Cosmological redshift is not generally equivalent to special-relativistic motion through space; this number is a convenient velocity label for z, not a measured peculiar velocity and not supernova ejecta speed. Bare c·z (≈23,026 km/s) is a different low-z approximation and is not mixed here.
How bright did AT2017kem become at its peak, and how many Suns does that equal? Explosion Energetics
At peak brightness, AT2017kem achieved an apparent magnitude of 22.2 around 2017/03/27. Corrected for cosmic distance and foreground interstellar dust, its intrinsic absolute magnitude was -15.4977. At this peak, the exploding star radiated with the incandescent brilliance of approximately 135.2 million Suns combined, briefly outshining the cumulative starlight of entire dwarf galaxies!
How much total energy was released by AT2017kem, and where did that energy go? Explosion Energetics
The total energy released by AT2017kem is unknown. Energy budgets differ by orders of magnitude depending on mechanism: a thermonuclear Type Ia liberates ~10⁵¹ ergs mostly as kinetic energy, while a core-collapse event liberates ~10⁵³ ergs of which ~99% escapes as neutrinos. Without a spectroscopic classification, neither figure applies to this transient.
How fast are the supernova ejecta and shockwave of AT2017kem expanding through space? Explosion Energetics
Spectroscopic line blueshifts imply an ejecta velocity of approximately 22,145 km/s (~7.4% of c) for AT2017kem. This is distinct from cosmological recession velocity inferred from redshift.
What powers the prolonged glow of AT2017kem weeks and months after detonation? Radioactive Engine
The power source sustaining AT2017kem cannot be identified without a classification. Classified supernovae are typically powered after peak by the radioactive decay of ⁵⁶Ni → ⁵⁶Co → ⁵⁶Fe, but nickel yields and whether a shock-breakout flash occurred depend on the explosion mechanism. No spectrum is published for this transient, so no ⁵⁶Ni mass or decay-powered light-curve narrative applies.
What chemical elements did AT2017kem create and disperse into the universe? Nucleosynthesis & Elements
The nucleosynthetic products of AT2017kem are unknown because its type is unresolved. Element yields depend directly on the explosion mechanism: a thermonuclear Type Ia produces mostly iron-peak elements such as 56Ni and 56Fe, whereas a core-collapse event produces large quantities of oxygen, neon, magnesium and silicon from successive burning shells. No spectrum has been published for this transient, so which of these occurred is not established.
Did AT2017kem leave behind a black hole, a neutron star, or nothing at all? Cosmic Remnant
Whether AT2017kem left a remnant is unknown. A thermonuclear Type Ia leaves no compact remnant (the white dwarf is fully disrupted), whereas a core-collapse event leaves a neutron star or black hole depending on progenitor mass. Without a spectroscopic classification, none of these outcomes can be asserted for this transient.
What will AT2017kem's explosion site look like in 1,000 to 10,000 years? Cosmic Remnant
Supernova remnants in general evolve through free-expansion, Sedov–Taylor, and radiative phases over centuries to millennia, sometimes becoming bright X-ray shells and occasionally compressing nearby molecular clouds. These are standard remnant-evolution models, not forecasts measured for AT2017kem. Whether this site will trigger star formation, reach particular X-ray temperatures, or match Cassiopeia A depends on local density and magnetic field—none of which are constrained by the data shown here.
In which galaxy did AT2017kem explode, and where is it located relative to the galactic center? Galactic Environment
No host galaxy is identified for AT2017kem in this catalog record. A blank host field means the association is unresolved here—it does not establish that the host is uncataloged, resolved in imaging, or securely linked by astrometry. Possible states (unidentified, hostless candidate, imaging detection without a catalog name, or a securely matched cataloged galaxy) require separate evidence that is not present in this field.
Where is AT2017kem located in the night sky and which constellation is it in? Sky Coordinates
In the celestial sphere, AT2017kem is located at Right Ascension 15:08:26.209 and Declination +27:12:02.64, situated in the constellation Corona Borealis (The Northern Crown). Because its declination is +27:12:02.64, it is primarily placed in the Northern celestial hemisphere.
How much Milky Way interstellar dust obscures our view of AT2017kem? Interstellar Dust
Along this line of sight, the catalog records a Milky Way foreground color excess of E(B−V) = 0.0388 mag (source: Analytical Galactic Disk Model (IAU)), corresponding to roughly A_V ≈ 0.12 mag for R_V = 3.1. Band-specific corrections (e.g. A_r) differ from A_V and should be applied when available. Map-based values (IRSA / Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011) must not be claimed unless that map was actually queried.
Across which photometric filter bands was AT2017kem monitored? Astronomical Observations
No calibrated photometry is published for AT2017kem. Without multi-epoch flux measurements, neither a light curve nor a peak magnitude can be established. Follow-up imaging from survey alert streams would be required to map its brightness evolution.
What did astronomical spectroscopy reveal about AT2017kem's chemical makeup? Astronomical Observations
No spectrum has been published for AT2017kem. Without spectroscopy, its chemical composition, expansion velocity, and physical classification cannot be established. Classification spectra from follow-up observatories would be required to identify diagnostic absorption and emission lines.
Who discovered AT2017kem and how was it first detected? Discovery & History
AT2017kem was officially reported on 2017/03/28 by Galaxy Zoo. Discoveries are typically flagged by high-cadence robotic survey telescopes (such as ATLAS, ZTF, Pan-STARRS, ASAS-SN, or Gaia) and worldwide amateur astronomers scanning the night sky, followed by rapid spectroscopic classification by international observatories.
How many scientific publications and observatories have contributed data to AT2017kem? Scientific Research
Data for AT2017kem are compiled from international astronomical notices, the IAU Transient Name Server (TNS), and peer-reviewed astrophysical journals.
How does AT2017kem contribute to measuring the Hubble Constant and the scale of the cosmos? Cosmology & Distance Ladder
AT2017kem cannot currently be used for cosmological distance work because its classification is unresolved. The distance ladder relies on type-specific techniques: Type Ia supernovae use the Phillips relation between peak absolute magnitude and decline rate, while Type II events use the Expanding Photosphere Method or SCM-II. An unclassified transient fits neither, so no Hubble-constant constraint can be derived from it until a spectrum establishes its type.
Could gravitational waves or neutrinos from AT2017kem be detected on Earth? Multi-Messenger Astronomy
No neutrino or gravitational-wave counterpart has been reported for AT2017kem, and none is expected to be identifiable without a classification. The multi-messenger signature differs sharply by type: core-collapse events emit a neutrino burst at shock breakout (detected once, for SN 1987A), while thermonuclear Type Ia events produce negligible neutrinos and gravitational waves. Searching for a counterpart before knowing which mechanism applies would be unfocused.
How does AT2017kem compare to famous historical supernovae like SN 1987A or the Crab Supernova? Historical Comparison
Compared to historical landmarks like SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (168,000 light-years away, naked-eye peak m = 2.9) or the Crab Supernova of 1054 (6,500 light-years away), the distance to AT2017kem is not established for a historical comparison (unclassified; redshift z = 0.076808 is published but no luminosity distance is derived). While historical naked-eye supernovae occurred within our Milky Way or its immediate satellites, modern discoveries like AT2017kem allow astrophysicists to probe diverse galactic environments, metallicities, and stellar populations across the broader universe.
Can I see AT2017kem tonight with a backyard telescope or binoculars? Backyard Observation
Unknown — no measured brightness. AT2017kem was discovered 3518 days ago (2017/03/28), but no calibrated photometry is published for it, so its current apparent magnitude cannot be stated. Without a magnitude there is no basis for a telescope-aperture recommendation. Use the coordinates and airmass chart above to plan a follow-up observation and report what you measure.
Does the radiation or shockwave from AT2017kem pose any threat to Earth? Planetary Safety
No, Earth is in zero danger. Supernovae are violent events emitting powerful gamma rays, X-rays, and cosmic rays; however, the astrophysical 'lethal kill zone' for our planet's protective ozone layer is estimated at 50 to 100 light-years. At a distance of 1172.3 Million Light-Years, the inverse-square law dilutes the radiation by quintillions of times, making AT2017kem completely harmless to our biosphere and purely a fascinating spectacle for human exploration.
Data sourced from IAU TNS, ALeRCE, WISeREP, and the sne.space.
View All General Astrophysics FAQs →